← All Advisories

CVE-2026-97549

Last refreshed2026-10-03

Status: UPDATED  |  Advisory ID: CVE-2026-97549

Key Details

CVECVE-2026-97549
Affected productsLinux Linux

Affected Products, Subsystems & Sectors

VendorProductAffected VersionsPatch Status
LinuxLinux
SubsystemsGeneral OT
SectorsMultiple

What to Know

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

xfs: fix under-reservation of blocks when repairing sf directories

Whilst running QA on XFS for-next as of 7.3-rc2 with MKFS_OPTIONS="-n

size=8192", I observed the following (trimmed) dmesg splat:

XFS: Assertion failed: args->total >= dp->i_nblocks - nblks, file: fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_da_btree.c, line: 2387

WARNING: fs/xfs/xfs_message.c:104 at assfail+0x46/0x4a [xfs], CPU#0: xfs_scrub/1426511

CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 1426511 Comm: xfs_scrub Tainted: G W 7.3.0-rc2-djwx #rc2 PREEMPT(lazy) 6e418570b606a39783b0e7e7b30dc407b965f9e8

Tainted: [W]=WARN

RIP: 0010:assfail+0x46/0x4a [xfs]

RSP: 0018:ffffc900010d7890 EFLAGS: 00010246

RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00000000ffffffd1

RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000021 RDI: ffffffffa059fd38

RBP: 0000000000000002 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000

R10: 000000000000000a R11: 000000007fffffff R12: ffffc900010d7940

R13: ffff888368d8f980 R14: ffffc900010d7a48 R15: ffffc900010d78d0

FS: 00007f445c5ce680(0000) GS:ffff8884a97ea000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000

CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033

CR2: 00007f443803b9a8 CR3: 0000000107a4b000 CR4: 00000000003506f0

Call Trace:

<TASK>

xfs_da_grow_inode_int+0x2e0/0x300 [xfs 5de2257e14108c136f11317e6bbb8ac77efd392c]

xfs_dir2_grow_inode+0x6e/0x150 [xfs 5de2257e14108c136f11317e6bbb8ac77efd392c]

xfs_dir2_sf_to_block+0x149/0x870 [xfs 5de2257e14108c136f11317e6bbb8ac77efd392c]

xrep_dir_swap_prep+0xe2/0x110 [xfs 5de2257e14108c136f11317e6bbb8ac77efd392c]

xrep_dir_swap+0xfb/0x2f0 [xfs 5de2257e14108c136f11317e6bbb8ac77efd392c]

xrep_dir_rebuild_tree+0x99/0x100 [xfs 5de2257e14108c136f11317e6bbb8ac77efd392c]

xrep_directory+0x83/0x1c0 [xfs 5de2257e14108c136f11317e6bbb8ac77efd392c]

xrep_attempt+0x4f/0x1e0 [xfs 5de2257e14108c136f11317e6bbb8ac77efd392c]

xfs_scrub_metadata+0x393/0x5b0 [xfs 5de2257e14108c136f11317e6bbb8ac77efd392c]

xfs_ioc_scrubv_metadata+0x306/0x570 [xfs 5de2257e14108c136f11317e6bbb8ac77efd392c]

xfs_file_ioctl+0xa4f/0x1150 [xfs 5de2257e14108c136f11317e6bbb8ac77efd392c]

__x64_sys_ioctl+0x76/0xc0

do_syscall_64+0x7a/0x3b0

entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53

This is a consequence of commit 0fe77e57588b98, which added the

following assertion to xfs_da_grow_inode_int:

ASSERT(args->total >= dp->i_nblocks - nblks);

Tracing this back to xrep_dir_swap_prep, I noticed that the xfs_da_args

object that's passed to xfs_dir2_sf_to_block sets args->total to 1.

This is incorrect because mkfs set the directory block size to 8k and

the filesystem block size to 4k. In other words, args->total should be

2 here, not 1.

Dave Chinner tripped over the same problem with the same branch through

a different channel -- his test setup set the fs block size to 1k, in

which case the directory block size is still set to 4k. Here,

args->total should be 4.

Changing the assignment of args->total to sc->mp->m_dir_geo->fsbcount

makes the assertion go away, but that isn't a complete fix. In

xrep_tempexch_estimate, we also incorrectly assume that a shortform

conversion requires 1 fsblock when it should be m_dir_geo->fsbcount.

Without that, we can under-reserve space in the transaction and cause a

filesystem shutdown.

Note that the xfs_dabuf_nfsb helper will compute the correct value for

directories and xattr, so we use that instead of open-coding the logic.

Also fix xrep_xattr_swap_prep to assign args->total via xfs_dabuf_nfsb

to avoid one logic bomb if we ever support multi-fsblock attrs.

Tripped-by: 0fe77e57588b98 ("xfs: assert the reservation covers each da fork growth") (NVD)

What to Do

Monitor Linux's web page for any future patch releases.

References

SourceReference
NVDhttps://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-97549
CVEhttps://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-97549