← All Advisories

Linux Kernel exec() Race with POSIX Timer sigqueue Leaves a Dangling Pointer Exploitable as Use-After-Free

Last refreshed2026-10-10

Status: UPDATED  |  Advisory ID: CVE-2026-98256

Key Details

CVECVE-2026-98256
CVSS Score / Version7.8 (High) / CVSS v3.1
Updated2026-10-07
CVSS VectorCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS Proseattack vector is local; attack complexity is low; privileges required is low; user interaction is none; scope is unchanged; confidentiality impact is high; integrity impact is high; availability impact is high.
Affected productsLinux Kernel

Affected Products, Subsystems & Sectors

VendorProductAffected VersionsPatch Status
LinuxLinux Kernel
SubsystemsOT Supporting Infrastructure
SectorsAll Sectors

What to Know

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

signal: Prevent exec() race

Hyunwoo debugged the following KASAN UAF splat:

BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __send_signal_locked+0xb27/0xba0

Write of size 8 at addr ffff888007ed80c8 by task poc/79

...

Call Trace:

__send_signal_locked+0xb27/0xba0

do_send_sig_info+0xa7/0x160

do_send_specific+0x76/0xa0

__x64_sys_tgkill+0x193/0x270

...

Allocated by task 80:

do_timer_create+0x1a4/0x1030

__x64_sys_timer_create+0x145/0x190

...

Freed by task 12:

kmem_cache_free_bulk+0x1f8/0x4a0

kvfree_rcu_bulk+0x14f/0x1c0

kfree_rcu_work+0x128/0x1a0

...

Last potentially related work creation:

kvfree_call_rcu+0x39/0x390

__flush_itimer_signals+0x211/0x320

flush_itimer_signals+0x47/0x90

begin_new_exec+0xa6b/0x28c0

It turned out that this happens with a non-leader exec() as Hyunwoo

explained:

de_thread() calls exchange_tids() before release_task(leader), so the

struct pid held by a SIGEV_THREAD_ID timer created against the leader's tid

now points to the thread which called execve(). pid_task() returns that

thread and lock_task_sighand() on it succeeds.

If the timer signal is blocked, its sigqueue stays queued on the leader's

task::pending. The next expiry of that timer can then run while

release_task() flushes the queue.

posixtimer_send_sigqueue() checks whether the sigqueue is already queued

with a plain list_empty(), which only reads list_head::next.

list_del_init() is not atomic and INIT_LIST_HEAD() stores list_head::next

before list_head::prev, so the check can pass in between. list_add_tail()

queues the entry on the task::pending of the live thread, and the

list_head::prev store from the flush then overwrites the list_head::prev

link that list_add_tail() has just set.

__flush_itimer_signals() does not undo that either. With list_head::prev

pointing at the entry itself, its list_del_init() only stores the same

values again, so the entry is not removed from the list. It is still there

after the last reference is dropped and the timer is freed by RCU, and the

list_add_tail() of a later tgkill() follows that list_head::prev into the

freed timer.

This problem surfaced with the recent commit which moved the sigqueue flush

out of the sighand lock held region.

Hyonwoo proposed to fix this by using list_del_init_careful(), but that

just papers over the problem. After some disucssions and various attempts

to solve it, Eric pointed out that there is no reason to flush

task::pending late in release_task() and it should be done in

exit_signals() already.

As nothing can collect and deliver signals which are queued in a dying

task's pending queue, there is no reason to delay it further.

But it has to be ensured that no signals can be queued into it after that

point. exit_signals() sets PF_EXITING in task::flags, which can be used as

an indicator for this.

Cure it by:

- Preventing signal queueing for task private signals (PIDTYPE_PID) when

the task has PF_EXITING set in __send_signal_locked() and in

posixtimer_send_sigqueue().

- Protecting the unlocked setting of PF_EXITING in exit_signals() for the

task group empty and the group exit case with sighand lock

- Flushing task::pending signals right there.

Optimize that by moving the whole pending list to an on-stack list head

under sighand lock and free the signals without the lock held.

There has been quite some discussion about the lockless flush and the

non-leader exec case on weakly ordered systems. The problem is that a third

party which tries to send a posix timer signal relies on the PID lookup to

find the target task and that lookup might result in the new leader when

the signal was originaly directed to the old leader. In case that the

signal was queued on the old leader then the lockless flush raised a

concern over the following situation:

old_leader new_leader third party

A: flush_list() // list_del_in

---truncated--- (NVD)

What to Do

Monitor Linux's web page for any future patch releases.

References

SourceReference
NVDhttps://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-98256
CVEhttps://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-98256